Tag: Lakenhal

The Five Senses

The Five Senses

Sight, Hearing, Smell, Taste and Touch

After stories rooted in the Bible and Greek mythology, here is something more earthly: the Five Senses. Sight, Hearing, Smell, Taste and Touch were popular subjects for painters and engravers in the sixteenth and seventeenth century. Series were eagerly bought by wealthy merchants and an intellectual middle class, as something attractive to hang on the wall, and to spark conversation among friends.

We will look at three series here: the comic panels of Jan Miense Molenaer, the sensual engravings of Hendrick Goltzius, and the earliest known paintings of Rembrandt. Pretty images, that reward a second look. Because at second glance, things get interesting. The senses delight, and the senses deceive. Let’s spot any moral message beneath the grinning peasants and the elegant lovers.

Jan Miense Molenaer and the Five Senses

Jan Miense Molenaer simply made his Five Senses funny. These small panels, each the size of an A4 and now in the Mauritshuis, show the senses as red-faced peasants drinking, groping, singing out of tune, and changing a baby’s nappy.

Sight comes first, a man and woman peering into an earthenware jug by lamplight, the eternal search for one more drop. But the well-dressed collector examining this painting is also, at that very moment, using his eyes.

Then Hearing follows: three jolly figures, singing and beating on a beer barrel. But music, drink, and good company were pleasures the buyer of this type of painting knew perfectly well. Jan Miense Molenaer’s peasants are a mirror: crude and exaggerated, but uncomfortably recognisable. The owner of this painting will pretend to be so much better than these drunk low-class singers. But is he?

Smell is unforgettable: a small boy’s dirty bottom, held up by a woman wiping him clean, while the man beside her turns away in disgust, clutching his beer mug at a safe distance. 

Taste shows a peasant leaning back to take a long pull from his tankard, a dagger at his belt hinting that the evening may not end well.

And Touch, the most banal sense of all and the last in the series, shows a peasant groping under a woman’s skirts — only to receive her slipper squarely on the head. This last panel has a small secret. An X-ray of the canvas revealed that Molenaer originally painted the scene more explicitly — the man’s arm almost entirely visible beneath the skirts, a bare knee exposed. He later painted over it, adding a blue petticoat to tone things down. Even in peasant satire, it seemed, there were limits.

A final detail worth mentioning: a series of Molenaer’s Five Senses is recorded in the auction catalogue of the collection of a Leiden professor and collector, Franciscus de le Boë Sylvius, at his death in 1673. The auction catalogue described the series as hanging in his dining room. It is a tempting image: the learned professor, having dinner with his intellectual friends and colleagues, and making fun of those grinning peasants. Low-class behaviour, they claim, that they themselves would never indulge in. But are those five senses not universal? For professors and peasants alike!

Hendrick Goltzius and the Five Senses

Forty years before Jan Miense Molenaer painted his peasants, the Haarlem master Hendrick Goltzius made a very different kind of five senses. Where Miense Molenaer went for laughs, Goltzius went for desire. His series of five engravings shows the senses as pairs of young lovers — elegantly dressed, intimately close, exchanging glances that leave little to the imagination. The images are sensual, sophisticated, and deliberately seductive.

But look more carefully, and each print carries a warning. Beneath every image runs a Latin pair of verses composed by Cornelius Schonaeus, the rector of the Haarlem Latin school. And in each one, Schonaeus delivers the same message: pleasure conceals a trap. The senses delight, and the senses deceive. Each engraving also contains an animal, placed within the scene — not decorative, but emblematic. Together, image, animal and verse make up a complete moral argument, elegant and layered.

Of all animals, the cat is perfectly chosen for the sense of Sight. A sharp-eyed hunter that waits in silence, and then strikes. It watches the lovers with the same calculating attention they turn on each other, directly or via the mirror. The moral message: the sense of sight leads, through its own excess, to a kind of blindness. As Schonaeus puts it:

Dum male lascivi nimium cohibentur ocelli,
In vitium praeceps stulta inventa ruit.

When lustful, hunting eyes are not restrained,
a foolish youth may blindly rush into ruin.

A deer stands in the engraving of Hearing — an animal whose large, open ears make it the natural emblem of the sense. Alert to every sound, it cannot choose not to listen, and that very sensitivity is what makes it vulnerable. A hunter’s call will startle the deer into the open — and that is where it is caught. Schonaeus draws the parallel:

Ne patulas blandis praebe Syrenibus aures,
Quae dulci cantus saepe lepore nocent.

Do not lend your ears to voices that flatter and tease!
Their sweet and charming song often causes harm. 

The Sirens (Syrenibus in the verse) of classical mythology are behind this moral message; those irresistible voices that drew sailors onto the rocks.

The dog in the image of Smell is no accident. In the emblem tradition the dog was celebrated above all other animals for the acuity of its nose — but also for its indiscriminate enthusiasm, sniffing at everything without judgment. Schonaeus’ verse makes the point:

Quamvis floriferus sit gratus naribus hortus,
Sepe tamen dulci fel sub odore latet.

Although a flower-filled garden is pleasing to the nose,
bitterness is often hidden beneath the sweet fragrance.

What smells sweet may conceal something bitter. The dog follows its nose without hesitation. So, perhaps, do the young lovers.

A monkey sits in the scene of Taste — and in Renaissance iconography the monkey was a well-established symbol of appetite, imitation and folly. It mimics human behaviour without understanding it, reaching for pleasure without restraint. Schonaeus is equally direct: appetite, of all kinds, has consequences.

Dulcia sepe nocent avido gustata palato,
Votaque damnosae luxuriosa gulae.

Sweets and treats bring harm to a greedy mouth!
And a lustful throat will only end in ruin.

The tortoise in the engraving of Touch is the most loaded of the five animals. It carries its house on its back and never leaves it, it symbolises the ideal of remaining within the domestic sphere. In Goltzius’ engraving, where a young couple embrace in an image that barely conceals its erotic charge, the tortoise delivers the pointed message: seek your pleasures at home, within the bounds of marriage, and not outside the door.

Quae conspecta nocent, manibus contingere noli,
Ne mox peiori corripiare malo.

What's already dangerous to look at, do not touch with your hands!
What follows may hurt you far more.

Rembrandt van Rijn and the Four Senses; where is the Fifth?

Around 1624, a teenager in Leiden picked up his brush and painted five small panels on the theme of the five senses. Rembrandt was about eighteen years old. These are his earliest known works. But only four survived; can we find the fifth?

Where Goltzius gave the senses to elegant, half-naked lovers, and Miense Molenaer handed them to grinning peasants, Rembrandt’s scenes are comic, but with a touch of human feeling.

Sight, in the Lakenhal Museum in Leiden, shows a spectacles seller on a market, demonstrating his wares to an elderly couple. The old man points at his nose, the old woman peers hopefully through her new pair of glasses. The woman bears a resemblance to Rembrandt’s mother, whom he used as a model throughout his Leiden years. In the old man with the heavy nose and ragged beard, we may recognise his father — Harmen Gerritsz van Rijn, a Leiden miller, whose face we know from a drawing his son made around 1630.

In Hearing, two elderly singers share a large open music book, a young man peering over their shoulders from behind. There is something touching about this painting. Two old souls, still singing together at their age.

Smell shows a young man who has fainted in his chair in anticipation of a barber-surgeon drawing blood. A worried old woman holds a handkerchief of smelling salts under his nose; the patient has passed out before the knife even touches him. Rembrandt mocks all three: the overconcerned nurse, the dubious surgeon, and the young man’s spectacular lack of courage. The plague was raging through Leiden in 1624, the year these panels were painted — and bloodletting was considered one of its treatments.

Touch takes us into an equally dubious operating room. A barber-surgeon is removing a ‘stone’ from his patient’s head. A popular motif, in which quacks purported to cure stupidity by surgery. The phrase ‘to have a stone removed from one’s head’ was common vernacular for being made a fool of — and that’s what Rembrandt was painting.

But where is Taste? The whereabouts of that panel are still unknown. These Rembrandt paintings are small, just 22 by 18 cm. Taste might be hanging somewhere hidden in a corner, or in a museum depot, or stored in the attic of your grandparents’ house. Now that we know what Rembrandt’s senses look like, we should all be on the lookout for Taste; use your eyes and ears for spotting this missing one. If you have a feeling where it can be, speak out and curators will listen. It makes sense to use all our senses to find the missing piece.

The Five Senses and the Ages of Man

As a way to close: one painting that contains all five senses at once. Theodoor Rombouts, a Flemish contemporary of Miense Molenaer, painted this large canvas (almost 2 by 3 meters) gathering five figures, each one embodying a different sense through gesture and attribute.

An old man at the far left holds a pair of spectacles to his eye and rests his other hand on a mirror — Sight. Beside him, a guitarist surrounded by a jumble of instruments at his feet — Hearing. A drinker with a wine glass and a bare chest, one foot resting on a copper basin for cooling wine, bread and melon spread before him — the image of a young Bacchus, standing for Taste. To the right, a smoker holds a pipe in one hand and a bunch of garlic in the other — Smell. And in the middle of the group, a blind man runs both hands lovingly over white marble statues — Touch, the one sense that has not abandoned him.

What makes the Rombouts quietly remarkable is its underlying structure. The five figures follow the arc of a human life. Taste and Smell are given to the young, their senses at full intensity, pleasure still uncomplicated by consequence. Hearing and Sight belong to two middle-aged men, grateful for what remains. And Touch is left to the old blind man at the centre, for whom most of life’s pleasures have faded. But who still reaches out, happy to feel the world with his hands.

That’s it! Thanks for looking at the pictures and for listening to my words.

Hagar and her son Ishmael

Hagar and her son Ishmael

Ishmael and Isaac: children of one father.

It took me a few years writing this story about Hagar and her son Ishmael, and about Abraham, Ishmael’s father. And also about Sarah and her son Isaac, who is Ishmael’s half-brother. Ishmael and Isaac: they are children of one father.

It’s not difficult to find paintings on this subject. Many artists over the centuries have taken it up, drawn to the emotional and dramatic interaction between the figures. But I hesitated for a long time, because this story stands at a crossroads between Judaism, Christianity, and Islam. And over time, the story of Isaac and Ishmael as half-brothers – perhaps quarreling, as brothers do – has been used, or even abused, to explain political and religious tensions, especially in the long struggle between Arabs and Jews.

But that is not the story I want to tell. I want to approach it differently, as a story of shared origin. A story of children of one father.

Here are the topics we’ll explore, following the narrative of the Book of Genesis:

Let’s start!

Abraham, Sarah, Hagar, and Ishmael

Let’s begin at the very beginning. With that odd old couple, Abraham and Sarah, both well over a hundred years old, and still no children! But Sarah has an idea!

They had grown old together, and the hope of ever having a child seemed to have faded. In the biblical account, it is Sarah who suggests that Abraham have a child with her young Egyptian maidservant, Hagar. Sarah blamed herself for their childlessness, saying, “The Lord has kept me from having children.” So she offered Hagar to Abraham, hoping to build a family through her. Abraham agreed, and Hagar became pregnant. She gave birth to a son, and they named him Ishmael. Abraham was the father.

A son is promised to Sarah

Then comes the next phase in the story. One day, Abraham and Sarah receive an unexpected visitor: an angel! The story makes it clear that this is a messenger of God, appearing in disguise.

The angel’s message sounds completely unbelievable: Sarah, at her advanced age, will have a son within a year. Abraham is told this directly. And he reacts with a gesture, as we see in Jan Provoost’s painting from the Louvre. Pointing toward his wife as if to say, “Her? At her age?” Sarah, standing in the doorway on the right, overhears it. Her reaction is the most human of all: she laughs. The Hebrew text says she laughs “within herself,” a kind of private chuckle of disbelief. One might say: she laughed out loud. The biblical version of LOL.

The name of the promised child will be Isaac, which fittingly means “he laughs.”

Two brothers: Ishmael and Isaac

Now there are two sons, Ishmael and Isaac. Two brothers, both children of Abraham, but from different mothers. Ishmael, the older, is the son of Hagar, Sarah’s Egyptian servant. Isaac, the younger, is the long-awaited child of Sarah, the mistress of the house.

Though they share a father, their positions could not be more different. One is born of a servant, the other of a free woman. One is firstborn, the other the child of promise.

The story suggests that there was tension between the boys. They were probably like any brothers, playing, teasing, perhaps quarreling? But Sarah becomes concerned. Or perhaps protective. She sees something, maybe rivalry, maybe mischief, and she is not pleased. In some versions, Ishmael is mocking Isaac. In others, it’s more ambiguous. But Sarah is firm. She turns to Abraham and tells him what she wants: send Hagar and Ishmael away.

In the print above, which I use to illustrate this scene, you can see Sarah speaking to Abraham in the foreground, and in the background, the two boys playing, fighting, hard to tell which. But the tension is there.

Abraham sends Hagar and Ishmael away

This next moment in the story has stirred the imagination of many artists. The emotional weight is immense: father and son, torn apart. Hagar, the mother, cast out. And Sarah, determined to protect her own child.

The Bible gives us the core of what happens. Sarah sees the two boys, Isaac and Ishmael, and she turns to Abraham and says, “Get rid of that slave woman and her son. He is not going to share the inheritance with my son, Isaac. I won’t have it.”

Abraham is deeply upset. Ishmael is his son. He does not want to send him away. But he listens, because a voice tells him to. For Abraham that’s the voice of God reassuring him that Isaac is the one through whom the family line will be counted. But God also gives Abraham this promise: “I will make a nation of the descendants of Hagar’s son because he is your son too.” That nation, in Islamic tradition, will be the Arab people. Ishmael is seen as the ancestor of the Arabs, and his role is honored as a founding figure.

So Abraham rises early the next morning. He prepares food, gives Hagar a supply of water, and sends her away with Ishmael. And the two of them wander into the desert.

This moment, the sending away, has become a favorite subject for painters and printmakers. And it is easy to see why. It is a perfect scene to show all the emotions: Abraham’s pain, Hagar’s grief, Ishmael’s innocence, Sarah’s determination. And the stillness of the moment before the wilderness swallows them.

Hagar and Ishmael in the desert

And so, Hagar and her son Ishmael find themselves alone in the desert. When the water runs out, Hagar breaks. In panic she runs up and down between the hills in the desert, all the time the same circle, and no water!

She places the boy in the shade and walks away, just far enough so she doesn’t have to watch him die. She sits down, weeping. Her words are raw: “I don’t want to watch the boy die.” It’s despair in its purest form. But then something shifts. The text in Genesis tells us that God hears the boy’s cries. An angel calls to Hagar — not one she sees, but one she hears: “Hagar, what’s wrong? Do not be afraid! Go to your boy and comfort him, for I will make a great nation from his descendants.”

In that moment, Hagar opens her eyes. And there, suddenly, is a well. Water. Life. She runs to fill her container and gives Ishmael a drink.

Ishmael survives. He grows up in the wilderness. He has many children, and through his line, the people of the Arab deserts trace their ancestry. This moment of despair, transformed by courage and grace, becomes the beginning of a nation.

This story isn’t just one of near-death and rescue — it’s also a story of inner voice, of resilience pushed into action. The Bible says Hagar heard the angel, not saw him. Perhaps the angel was not a visible figure, but a message rising up from within: “Please do not give up, but give it another try. There is still hope.” In Carel Fabritius’ painting, this is shown beautifully — the angel stands behind Hagar. She does not see him. She hears him, as an inner message of encouragement. And that makes all the difference. The image of Hagar in the desert, distraught and fearing for Ishmael’s life, is also an image of hope. This moment symbolizes the resilience and faith that inspire perseverance, even in the darkest times.

Family reunion

There is something deeply moving in how these family ties circle back. According to Arab tradition, Abraham — known as Ibrahim — and his son Ishmael reconciled later in life. Together, they built the Kaaba in Mecca, which became the spiritual heart of Islam. The well Hagar discovered, now called the Zamzam well, still flows near the Kaaba, inside the Great Mosque.

And in the Jewish and Christian traditions, Isaac and Ishmael too found each other again. When Abraham died at the age of 175, it was both his sons, Isaac and Ishmael, who came together to bury him. As it is written in Genesis: “Abraham lived for 175 years, and he died at a ripe old age, having lived a long and satisfying life. He breathed his last and joined his ancestors in death. His sons Isaac and Ishmael buried him in the cave of Machpelah.”

So perhaps this story, often seen as the origin of division, also carries the seeds of reunion. Two brothers, children of one father!

Bonus: from desert to pilgrimage – Hagar’s legacy in Mecca

To bring the story of Hagar and Ishmael into our present day, we can look to the sacred city of Mecca, where Muslims from around the world travel each year to perform the Hajj, the holy pilgrimage. This city of 2.5 million inhabitants, visited by more than 20 million pilgrims annually, was built on the site in the desert where Hagar found water for Ishmael, named as the Zamzam well.

Great Mosque of Mecca (Masjid al-Haram).

Today, the Great Mosque of Mecca, the Masjid al-Haram, stands on this sacred ground. It is the most holy site in the Islamic world, and within its walls, several locations are directly tied to the story of Hagar, Ishmael, and Abraham (Ibrahim in the Islamic tradition):

  • The Kaaba — the cuboid-shaped building at the heart of the mosque and the most sacred site in Islam. It is the structure that, according to tradition, was built or rebuilt by Abraham and Ishmael, together as father and son.
  • The Hijr Ismail — a semicircular area adjacent to the Kaaba that pilgrims are not to walk upon. It marks the site where Abraham constructed a shelter for Hagar and Ishmael.
  • The Zamzam Well — the water source discovered by Hagar after hearing the angel’s message to keep searching. To this day, pilgrims can receive a five-liter bottle of Zamzam water.
  • Safa and Marwa — two small hills now enclosed within a covered passageway. This is where Hagar, in her desperation, ran back and forth seven times in search of water for her child. That journey is reenacted by pilgrims as part of the Hajj ritual.

So the footsteps of Hagar, a woman alone in the desert, a mother desperately searching for life for her son, are still being followed by millions today. Her strength, her voice, her perseverance have become a foundational memory in the faith of Islam.